Search Results
Return to Search Parameters
Displaying 1 to 16 of 16 Records
Submitted By  Meeting Date:Type   _Title___________________________________________  _Department________________  _Submitted For________________
06/24/2014:CC  Resolution 2014-41 - A Resolution Authorizing Changes to the Owl Creek Subdivision  Planning & Codes
  The attached resolution provides for alterations to the previously approved OSRD-IP Development Plan for the Owl Creek Subdivision. The project is located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Concord and Waller Roads, east of the Chestnut Springs Subdivision. The proposed plan incorporates the 10.16 acres rezoned to OSRD-IP, pursuant to Ordinance 2014-01 into the project. The revised design provides a total of 85 lots on approximately 87.6 acres.  The currently approved plan shows 76 lots on approximately 77.4 acres.

Other changes to the plan include:
  1. The addition of 9 lots resulting from the addition of the White property to the subdivision;
  2. A increase of 4.67 acres in the open space to be provided;
  3. A reconfiguration of the lots within the project;
  4. A revised internal street design on the east side of the project to incorporate a curve that turns to the south (Glenmore Lane);
  5. Removal of the previously approved stub street from the roundabout that terminated on the northern boundary of the former White property;
  6. A slight realignment of the southern portion of Cressy Lane, and a reconfiguration of the abutting lots;
  7. Reconfiguration of the cemetery boundary to reflect its actual location;
  8. Elimination of the bridge connection to Waller Road, which was shown on the concept plan that accompanied Ordinance 2014-01.
Under the new proposal, the total area of the open space provided is 56.1 acres. This number represents 67% of the project area. The currently approved plan shows 51.43 acres or 66.4% of the project area.  A total of 65% is required by Code.  

A total of 24 lots are required to have a maximum of 2,500 square feet of heated living space per Section 78-198(1)d of the zoning ordinance.  


Because the proposal increases the number of single-family lots and also increases the area of the open space provided, approval of the revised OSRD-IP Development Plan by the Board of Commissioners is necessary, per the requirements of Section 78-185(b)2 of the Municipal Code.

The reconfigured boundary for the Still-Williams-Jenkins family cemetery is shown on the plan. The cemetery was incorrectly located on previous plans.  The location was verified by using earlier surveys and by archaeological investigations conducted on site by qualified contractors working for the developer.  Mr. and Mrs. Donald Jenkins are heirs to at least one person buried in the cemetery and have been involved with the development of the plan related to the cemetery.  They have agreed to the reconfiguration of the area with the understanding that the developer will protect the cemetery throughout development, set aside the area as open space designated as a scenic easement, and install permanent wrought iron fencing upon completion of the construction of the infrastructure.

On June 2, 2014 the Planning Commission voted eight for and one against (8-1), to approve a revised preliminary plan for the Owl Creek Subdivision.  The plan also included entrance features and signage to be located at the main entrance into the subdivision from Concord Road.  

As part of the approval, the Planning Commission also continued certain exceptions in regard to the design of the plan as permitted by Sections 78-198 and 78-512 of the Zoning Ordinance. Please note that the exceptions, with one revision, were included as part of the original approval granted for the project in 2008. The one additional area included as part of the exceptions relates to the buffer width adjacent to existing residential development.  The Code (Sec. 78-198(2)d) requires a 100 foot wide buffer, but allows the Planning Commission to reduce or eliminate the buffer under certain circumstances where a 100 foot buffer is not needed.  The proposed plan proposes a buffer width of 50 feet at its narrowest point.  The existing mature trees in this area would remain.  This area lies along the southerly boundary of the former White property.  The exceptions are detailed in the Planning Commission approval letter, which is attached. Finally, the Planning Commission also voted, eight for and one against (8-1) to forward a recommendation of approval of the corresponding revisions to the OSRD-IP Development Plan to the Board of Commissioners. 

Please contact the Planning and Codes Director should you have any questions.
01/26/2015:CC  Ordinance 2015-01 - Authorizing Abandonment of the Public Street Right-of-Way for Halyard Court   Planning & Codes
  Pursuant to the revised final plat for Mallory Park Phase II, Lot 202, approved by the Planning Commission on December 1, 2014, the small section of roadway known as Halyard Court requires abandonment.  Ordinance 2015-01, if approved, will provide for the formal abandonment of the right-of-way for Halyard Court as a publicly maintained street. Halyard Court lies on the west side of Mallory Lane, approximately 0.25 miles north of the roundabout from its intersection with Mallory Lane. The existing right-of-way includes an area of 24,019 square feet (0.551 ac.), a width of 50 feet and a length of approximately 300 feet .  Construction of the streets, including the curbing and sidewalks within Mallory Park Phase II, was completed in August 2013.  The contractor has not yet completed the installation of the final asphaltic topping on the streets. The utilities (drainage, water and electric) have also been installed. The streets within the project have not yet been accepted for maintenance by the City; however, the right-of-way has been dedicated to the City, necessitating the proposed abandonment.  
 
There is also an existing eight-inch diameter water line that is located within the Halyard Court right-of-way that will remain.  A new easement will be established for the water line as part of the revised final plat.
At the western end of the water line is a hydrant that will be removed. The City provides water service to the project. 

Please note that the developer will be responsible for removal of all existing infrastructure as appropriate and restoring the area to accommodate the future development of the tract.  The improvements must be removed and the area restored before the revised final plat may be recorded.  

At its December 1, 2014 regular meeting, the Planning Commission approved a revised preliminary plan for Mallory Park, Phase II that proposed the subdivision of the existing Lot 202 into three lots and the elimination of Halyard Court.  The following table details the site calculations.  Please also refer to the vicinity map, attached below.  

 
 
 
LOT # EXISTING AREA PROPOSED AREA
202 35.44 ac. 12.52 ac.
203   13.67 ac.
204   9.80 ac.
HALYARD CT 0.55 ac. 0 ac.
TOTAL 35.99 ac. 35.99 ac.
 
Also at its December 1st meeting, the Planning Commission approved a revised final plat for the project and a site plan for Lot 202. The approved site plan includes two 39,200 sq. ft. buildings (78,400 sq. ft. total).  Access to the project will be provided directly from Mallory Lane.  The area of Halyard Court will be incorporated into the development plan. 

The preliminary plan for Mallory Park Phase II was originally approved by the Planning Commission on December 6, 2010.  The plan was subsequently revised and approved by the Planning Commission on March 3, 2014. The original recorded final plat is attached.  

The Planning Commission also approved a site plan for the BMW of Nashville location on Lot 201 on March 3, 2014, also located in Phase II of the project.  The lot includes an area of approximately 13.22 acres.  The approved plan includes the construction of a building having an area of 39,500 sq. ft. on 8.66 acres.  The remaining 4.56 acres will be reserved for future expansion.  The configuration of Lot 201 is unaffected by the latest proposal.  

Abandonment of City-controlled right-of-way requires approval by ordinance. Under state law, when right-of-way is abandoned, it automatically reverts back to the adjoining property owners, which in this case would be Tennsco Corporation. 

If the proposed ordinance is approved on first reading, the Planning Commission will provide its review and recommendation of the proposal to the Board of Commissioners at its February 2, 2015 meeting. Second and final reading is scheduled for February 9, 2015.

Should you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact the Planning and Codes Director.
02/09/2015:CC  Ordinance 2015-01 - Second and Final Reading of Ordinance Authorizing Abandonment of the Public Street Right-of-Way for Halyard Court   Planning & Codes
  Pursuant to the revised final plat for Lot 202 within Mallory Park Phase II, approved by the Planning Commission on December 1, 2014, the small section of roadway known as Halyard Court requires abandonment.  Ordinance 2015-01, if approved, will provide for the formal abandonment of the right-of-way as a publicly maintained street. Halyard Court lies on the west side of Mallory Lane, approximately 0.25 miles north of the roundabout. The existing right-of-way includes an area of 24,019 square feet (0.551 ac.), a width of 50 feet and a length of approximately 300 feet .  Construction of the streets, including the curbing and sidewalks within Mallory Park Phase II, was completed in August 2013.  The contractor has not yet completed the installation of the final asphaltic topping on the streets. The utilities (drainage, water and electric) have also been installed. The streets within the project have not yet been accepted for maintenance by the City; however, the right-of-way has been dedicated to the City, necessitating the proposed abandonment.  
 
There is also an existing water line being eight inches in diameter line that is located within the Halyard Court right-of-way that will remain.  A new easement will be established for the water line as part of the revised final plat.
At the western end of the water line is a hydrant that will be removed. The City provides water service to the project. 

Please note that the developer will be responsible for removal of all existing infrastructure as appropriate and restoring the area to accommodate the future development of the tract.  The improvements must be removed and the area restored before the revised final plat may be recorded.  

At its December 1, 2014 regular meeting, the Planning Commission approved a revised preliminary plan for Mallory Park, Phase II that proposed the subdivision of the existing Lot 202 into three lots and the elimination of Halyard Court.  The following table details the site calculations.  Please also refer to the vicinity map, attached below.  
 
LOT # EXISTING AREA PROPOSED AREA
202 35.44 ac. 12.52 ac.
203   13.67 ac.
204   9.80 ac.
HALYARD CT 0.55 ac. 0 ac.
TOTAL 35.99 ac. 35.99 ac.

Also at its December 1st meeting, the Planning Commission approved a revised final plat for the project and a site plan for Lot 202. The approved site plan includes two 39,200 sq. ft. buildings (78,400 sq. ft. total).  Access to the project will be provided directly from Mallory Lane.  The area of Halyard Court will be incorporated into the development plan. 

The preliminary plan for Mallory Park Phase II was originally approved by the Planning Commission on December 6, 2010.  The plan was subsequently revised and approved by the Planning Commission on March 3, 2014. The original recorded final plat for Phase II of the project is attached below.  

The Planning Commission also approved a site plan for the BMW of Nashville location on Lot 201 on March 3, 2014, also located in Phase II of the project.  The lot includes an area of approximately 13.22 acres.  The approved plan includes the construction of a building having an area of 39,500 sq. ft. on 8.66 acres.  The remaining 4.56 acres will be reserved for future expansion.  The configuration of Lot 201 is unaffected by the latest proposal.  

Abandonment of City-controlled right-of-way requires approval by ordinance. Under state law, when right-of-way is abandoned, it automatically reverts back to the adjoining property owners, which in this case would be Tennsco Corporation. 

On February 2, 2015 the Planning Commission voted nine for and zero against (9-0) to forward a recommendation of approval of Ordinance 2015-01 to the Board of Commissioners.  
 

Should you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact the Planning and Codes Director.
02/23/2015:CC  Resolution 2015-12 - A Resolution Authorizing Changes to the OSRD Development Plan for the Morgan Farms Subdivision  Planning & Codes
  Resolution 2015-12 authorizes changes to the OSRD Development Plan for the Morgan Farms Subdivision.  The changes include:

 
  1. Section Two - Added a detention pond in Open Space "I".  The area is currently within a scenic easement and is located south of lots 234 through 237.
  2. Section Three - Removed three lots and renumbered the lots in the area, omitting numbers 14, 15 and 16.
  3. Section Five - Revised the phase line in Open Space "L" to allow for two additional lots (#208 & #209) along the east side of Barnstaple Lane. The lots will be added to Section Six. Revised roundabout right-of-way, edge of pavement, and sidewalks per approved construction plans. Renumbered the lots in Section Six to numbers in the 200’s.
  4. The excess open space area has been decreased by 0.09 acres (3,920 sq. ft.).
 
 The open space calculations are detailed in the following table below.

 
  AUG. 2014 FEB. 2015
ROW INTERNAL STREETS (AC) 18.73 18.64
AREAS IN 25% SLOPES (AC) 3.01 3.14
USABLE LAND AREA (AC) 173.84 173.83
LAND AREA IN LOTS (AC) 101.07 98.64
OPEN SPACE REQUIRED (AC) 71.93 74.36
OPEN SPACE PROVIDED (AC) 86.90 89.42
EXCESS OPEN SPACE (AC) 15.06 14.97
NUMBER OF LOTS 173 173
 

Because the proposal decreases the amount of excess open space, approval of the revised development plan by the Board of Commissioners is required, per the requirements of Section 78-185(b)2 of the Municipal Code. As part of its review, the Planning Commission also voted unanimously, nine for and zero against (9-0) to recommend approval of the corresponding changes to the project to the Board of Commissioners.  

Should you have any questions or require additional information please contact the Planning and Codes Director.
06/08/2015:CC  Ordinance 2015-08 - An Ordinance to Amend Ordinance 2014-09, the Budget Appropriations Ordinance for the 2014-2015 Fiscal Year  Finance
  Please find attached Ordinance 2015-09 which, if approved, will amend the current FY 2014-2015 Appropriations (Budget) Ordinance to formally authorize recommended adjustments to expenditures and operating transfers for the General Fund, Drug Fund, Debt Service Fund, Equipment Replacement Fund, Capital Projects Fund and the Insurance Fund.

A budget amendment is legally required when the total actual expenditures for a fund are expected to exceed the original total appropriation for the fund. The need for these amendments are typically identified by staff during the course of the fiscal year and then formally considered by the Board one time at the end of the fiscal year to ensure legal compliance. Often these amendments are needed to provide current year funding for capital projects and equipment that will be initiated or purchased in the new fiscal year beginning July 1, 2015. This amendment requires staff to identify and certify that additional revenue sources in the current fiscal year are available to fund the new expenditures.

The recommended amendments are summarized below:

 General Fund (110)

Additional revenues of $1,985,000 reflect positive revenue collections in the current year over original budgeted estimates. 

Proposed expenditure amendments are as follows:
  1. A special FY 2015 year-end appropriation transfer of $1,845,000 from the General Fund to the Capital Projects Fund funded through projected excess revenue collections in the current fiscal year to pay for certain proposed FY 2016 capital projects and equipment.

    The projects include funding for upgrades and expansion of the City's radio communication system ($1,000,000 – page 41 of CIP), a replacement fire station alerting system known as Locution ($180,000 – page 43 of CIP), funding for Smith Park maintenance projects, including driveway widening, replacement of mansion roof and stabilization of the historic kitchen building ($400,000 – page 99 of CIP),Wikle Park off-site improvements ($125,000 – page 95 of CIP) and funding for design and construction of a traffic roundabout at the intersection of Crockett Road and Raintree Parkway/Green Hill Boulevard. ($140,000 – page 57 of CIP).  

     
  2. A special FY 2015 year-end transfer of $3,000,000 from the General Fund unassigned fund balance to the Capital Projects fund to provide additional funding for several smaller transportation projects designed to improve safety and congestion delays during peak travel periods (see attachment A for project list).

     
  3. A special FY 2015 year-end transfer of $140,000 from the General Fund to the Equipment Replacement Fund for the FY 2016 purchase of a Bobcat excavator for the Parks Department ($55,000) and a chipper truck for the Public Works Department ($85,000).  This transfer will be funded through projected excess revenue collections in the current fiscal year.

     
  4. An appropriation increase to the Codes Enforcement activity for $45,450 for two codes vehicles budgeted in FY 2014, but due to delays, delivered and paid for in FY 2015, with funding provided by the projected savings through the under-spending of budgeted FY 2015 General Fund appropriations.    
     
The proposed total General Fund appropriation increase of $5,030,450 will leave a minimum projected General Fund unassigned fund balance as of June 30, 2015 of $28.9 million.  The fund balance will exceed the stated budget policy objective of maintaining a minimum of 40% in reserves for future needs and emergencies.  Please note it is likely that the final unrestricted fund balance will be higher because the exact amount will not be known until August 1, 2015 when the Halls Income Tax proceeds for FY 2015 are received from the State of Tennessee.

Drug Fund (126)

Increasing the appropriation for this fund by $15,355 for the purchase of four (4) truck vaults with "bumperchute" tents.  These vaults were installed in the four new patrol SUV's as part of the planned 2015 vehicle replacement schedule.  This purchase was approved at the September 22, 2014 City Commission meeting.  Funding for the expenditure will be provided through the restricted Federal Forfeited Property fund balance (current balance as of May 2015 is $379,866).

Debt Service Fund (211)

Increasing the expenditure appropriation of the Debt Service Fund by $6,080 for the final interest payment associated with the Series 2003 G.O. Refunding Bonds that was inadvertently omitted from the FY 2015 budget appropriation.

Equipment Replacement Fund (310)

Additional revenue of $140,000 reflects the special year-end appropriation transfer from the General Fund as referenced above.

Capital Projects Fund (311)

Additional revenue of $4,845,000 reflects the special year-end appropriation transfers from the General Fund as referenced above.

Insurance Fund (320)

Additional revenue of $146,600 reflects stop loss (reinsurance) amounts received for payments of individual medical claims above the stop loss base amount of $70,000 and prescription drug rebates from Blue Cross ($65,800).   Note that additional stop loss payments and prescription drug rebates may be received for claims incurred prior to June 30, 2015.  

Increasing the appropriation of this fund by $400,000 for medical claims exceeding the budgeted estimate for FY 2015.  This increase is due to a few significant claims (six covered individuals have incurred approximately $570,000 in claims paid this fiscal year) and does not represent an increasing claims trend across the group as a whole.  The $400,000 increased appropriation includes a conservative 10% contingency (approximately $180,000) for any unknown medical situations that may arise prior to June 30, 2015.  Funding will be provided through the payments received from our stop loss carrier as referenced above as well as the positive cash flow of the Insurance Fund as of June 30, 2015.  Even with the increased medical claims, the health insurance division of the Insurance Fund is projected to show a healthy fund balance of $1,381,700 at June 30, 2015.            
 
 

SUMMARY

The recommended budget appropriations amendments are primarily bookkeeping in nature to meet the legal requirements for compliance with annual budget appropriations. Whenever possible, budget amendments for the current fiscal year should be carried out before the end of the fiscal year and prior to the beginning of the independent audit for FY 2015.

Should the City Commission have any questions concerning this information, please contact the Finance Director.
06/22/2015:CC  Ordinance 2015-08 - An Ordinance to Amend Ordinance 2014-09, the Budget Appropriations Ordinance for the 2014-2015 Fiscal Year  Finance
  Please find attached Ordinance 2015-08 which, if approved, will amend the current FY 2014-2015 Appropriations (Budget) Ordinance to formally authorize recommended adjustments to expenditures and operating transfers for the General Fund, Drug Fund, Debt Service Fund, Equipment Replacement Fund, Capital Projects Fund and the Insurance Fund.

A budget amendment is legally required when the total actual expenditures for a fund are expected to exceed the original total appropriation for the fund. The need for these amendments are typically identified by staff during the course of the fiscal year and then formally considered by the Board one time at the end of the fiscal year to ensure legal compliance. Often these amendments are needed to provide current year funding for capital projects and equipment that will be initiated or purchased in the new fiscal year beginning July 1, 2015. This amendment requires staff to identify and certify that additional revenue sources in the current fiscal year are available to fund the new expenditures.

The recommended amendments are summarized below:

 General Fund (110)

Additional revenues of $1,985,000 reflect positive revenue collections in the current year over original budgeted estimates. 

Proposed expenditure amendments are as follows:
  1. A special FY 2015 year-end appropriation transfer of $1,845,000 from the General Fund to the Capital Projects Fund funded through projected excess revenue collections in the current fiscal year to pay for certain proposed FY 2016 capital projects and equipment.

    The projects include funding for upgrades and expansion of the City's radio communication system ($1,000,000 – page 41 of CIP), a replacement fire station alerting system known as Locution ($180,000 – page 43 of CIP), funding for Smith Park maintenance projects, including driveway widening, replacement of mansion roof and stabilization of the historic kitchen building ($400,000 – page 99 of CIP), Wikle Park off-site improvements ($125,000 – page 95 of CIP) and funding for design and construction of a traffic roundabout at the intersection of Crockett Road and Raintree Parkway/Green Hill Boulevard. ($140,000 – page 57 of CIP).  

     
  2. A special FY 2015 year-end transfer of $3,000,000 from the General Fund unassigned fund balance to the Capital Projects fund to provide additional funding for several smaller transportation projects designed to improve safety and congestion delays during peak travel periods (see attachment A for project list).

     
  3. A special FY 2015 year-end transfer of $140,000 from the General Fund to the Equipment Replacement Fund for the FY 2016 purchase of a Bobcat excavator for the Parks Department ($55,000) and a chipper truck for the Public Works Department ($85,000).  This transfer will be funded through projected excess revenue collections in the current fiscal year.

     
  4. An appropriation increase to the Codes Enforcement activity for $45,450 for two codes vehicles budgeted in FY 2014, but due to delays, delivered and paid for in FY 2015, with funding provided by the projected savings through the under-spending of budgeted FY 2015 General Fund appropriations.    
     
The proposed total General Fund appropriation increase of $5,030,450 will leave a minimum projected General Fund unassigned fund balance as of June 30, 2015 of $28.9 million.  The fund balance will exceed the stated budget policy objective of maintaining a minimum of 40% in reserves for future needs and emergencies.  Please note it is likely that the final unrestricted fund balance will be higher because the exact amount will not be known until August 1, 2015 when the Halls Income Tax proceeds for FY 2015 are received from the State of Tennessee.

Drug Fund (126)

Increasing the appropriation for this fund by $15,355 for the purchase of four (4) truck vaults with "bumperchute" tents.  These vaults were installed in the four new patrol SUV's as part of the planned 2015 vehicle replacement schedule.  This purchase was approved at the September 22, 2014 City Commission meeting.  Funding for the expenditure will be provided through the restricted Federal Forfeited Property fund balance (current balance as of May 2015 is $379,866).

Debt Service Fund (211)

Increasing the expenditure appropriation of the Debt Service Fund by $6,080 for the final interest payment associated with the Series 2003 G.O. Refunding Bonds that was inadvertently omitted from the FY 2015 budget appropriation.

Equipment Replacement Fund (310)

Additional revenue of $140,000 reflects the special year-end appropriation transfer from the General Fund as referenced above.

Capital Projects Fund (311)

Additional revenue of $4,845,000 reflects the special year-end appropriation transfers from the General Fund as referenced above.

Insurance Fund (320)

Additional revenue of $146,600 reflects stop loss (reinsurance) amounts received for payments of individual medical claims above the stop loss base amount of $70,000 and prescription drug rebates from Blue Cross ($65,800).   Note that additional stop loss payments and prescription drug rebates may be received for claims incurred prior to June 30, 2015.  

Increasing the appropriation of this fund by $400,000 for medical claims exceeding the budgeted estimate for FY 2015.  This increase is due to a few significant claims (six covered individuals have incurred approximately $570,000 in claims paid this fiscal year) and does not represent an increasing claims trend across the group as a whole.  The $400,000 increased appropriation includes a conservative 10% contingency (approximately $180,000) for any unknown medical situations that may arise prior to June 30, 2015.  Funding will be provided through the payments received from our stop loss carrier as referenced above as well as the positive cash flow of the Insurance Fund as of June 30, 2015.  Even with the increased medical claims, the health insurance division of the Insurance Fund is projected to show a healthy fund balance of $1,381,700 at June 30, 2015.            


 
SUMMARY

The recommended budget appropriations amendments are primarily bookkeeping in nature to meet the legal requirements for compliance with annual budget appropriations. Whenever possible, budget amendments for the current fiscal year should be carried out before the end of the fiscal year and prior to the beginning of the independent audit for FY 2015.

Should the City Commission have any questions concerning this information, please contact the Finance Director.
10/12/2015:CC  Ordinance 2015-12 - An Ordinance Rezoning Approximately 261 Acres, Located on the South Side of Crockett Road, from R-2 to OSRD  Planning & Codes
  Ordinance 2015-12, if approved,will rezone 261.04 acres of land, located at 9305 Crockett Road. The subject property includes the historic Holtland/Wildwood home.  

Mike Ford Custom Builders LLC Homes recently completed  negotiations to buy the property for $10.5 million. The purchase price is based on an assumed development lot yield of up to 127 lots under the existing R-2 zoning designation for the property. The contract stipulates that should the buyer receive City approval of a development plan providing for more than 127 lots, the final purchase price would be increased by $35,000 for each additional lot above 127. The buyer plans to partner with CPS Land, LLC to develop the property.  Closing on the sale of the property is to occur no later than January 19, 2016.  Mr. Charles Witherspoon, who currently resides on the property will retain a life estate in his existing residence. 

A previous OSRD-IP rezoning proposal was presented for City Commission consideration in January 2015 under Ordinance 2014-21 but failed to win approval.  That proposal included a total project area of 263.98 acres. The current proposal includes a total proposed rezoning area of 261.04 acres.  The difference relates to the desire of the developer to retain one lot located in the NW corner of the property under the current R-2 zoning classification. The lot includes an area of 2.94 acres and is located between the western property boundary and the TVA easement, adjacent to Crockett Road 
 
 
Changes Since First Reading
Since first reading, which occurred on September 14, the developer has submitted several minor changes to the plan.  The area of the property that is to retain the R-2 zoning classification has been increased a total of 0.32 acres, or from the original area of 2.94 acres to a new area of 3.26 acres.  The proposed changes relate to the desire to maintain a lot size that would facilitate the keeping of farm animals.  Section 10-4 of the Municipal Code requires a lot area of at least three acres in order to keep livestock or fowl.  The increase in the R-2 lot resulted in a decrease in the OSRD project area of 0.32 acres or from the original total of 261.04 acres to a new total of 260.72 acres.  Other minor changes to the plan include:
  1. A decrease in the area of dedicated ROW for Crockett Road from 1.35 ac, to 1.33 ac.;
  2. A decrease in the total developable land area from 243.83 ac. to 243.53 ac.;
  3. A decrease in the total usable land area from 221.52 ac. to 221.22 ac.;
  4. A decrease in the dedicated open space from 104.46 ac. to 104.16 ac.;
  5. A reduction in area for open space "Q", which is adjacent to the R-2 lot, from 28.42 ac. to 28.11 ac.; and
  6. A change to the property description, resulting from the R-2 lot modification.  Ordinance 2015-12, attached below has been updated with the revised description. 
The area of the OSRD lots remained unchanged from the original submittal.

In addition to the items noted above, staff and the City's traffic engineer have continued to work with the applicant to evaluate the potential for a roundabout at the proposed Crockett Road entrance to the subdivision in lieu of a two-way stop.  After further survey work, preliminary design, and traffic capacity analysis, all parties believe that a roundabout is a viable option at this location (see attached roundabout analysis report).  Note that the preliminary schematic layout for a possible roundabout shows the construction to be south of Crockett Road so as to eliminate any right of way impacts on existing homes to the north.


OSRD Plan Summary
Ragan Smith Associates and CPS Land have submitted a proposed plan showing a total of 153 OSRD-compliant lots, including a large lot that includes Wildwood and the current Witherspoon residence.  The site specifics are detailed in the following table:  
 
 
DETAIL AREA (SF) AREA (AC)
Area of Project   261.04
Number of Proposed Lots -- OSRD 153
Number of Potential Lots -- R-2 141
Density (Dwelling Units per Acre) -- R-2 0.53 DUPA
Average Lot Size -- OSRD 39,681 0.91
Largest Lot Size -- OSRD 367,940 8.45
Smallest Lot Size -- OSRD 17,600 0.40
Excess Open Space Provided -- OSRD 3,956,990 90.84
Density (Dwelling Units per Acre) -- OSRD 0.59 DUPA

The largest lot, identified in the table above, is the site of the historic Holtland/Wildwood Home. The sale agreement includes a provision requiring the buyer to use its experience in restoration and residential construction to manage and use the resources necessary to finance the preservation of the historic mansion and grounds prior to selling the property to a third party.
 

The plan proposes the preservation of approximately 7.45 acres around the historic home, not including the one acre allocated to the historic home itself as part of Lot 1. The proposed historic preservation area also includes the existing Witherspoon residence. Section 78-198(1)c of the Municipal Code allows for increased lot sizes adjacent to historically significant sites (as designated by the Board of Commissioners) to promote the restoration and/or preserve the integrity of the historic site. The additional acreage, in excess of one acre, can be credited as permanently dedicated open space. Any historic structure used as a residential dwelling must be counted toward the total number of dwelling units permitted in the development. The development must be configured to be compatible in architectural style, size, scale and orientation with the historically significant site and structures. Additionally, the proposed preservation plan must be submitted to the Historic Commission for its review and recommendations prior to formal approval of the development plan by the Board of Commissioners. A similar situation occurred in Inglehame Farms, where a total of 9.09 acres was preserved around the historic mansion there.

The southeastern portion of the project is encumbered by the Hillside Protection (HP) Overlay. The area includes steep hillside areas in excess of 15% and elevations of 850 feet and above.  Lots in this area will meet the three acre size requirement as required by Code.  Planning Commission approval of HP site plans, which would include elevations, is required before building permits will be issued for these HP designated lots.  The OSRD plan also shows a hiking trail that meanders up the hill in this area.  

The proposed plan also provides for a ten foot wide (incorrectly shown as eight foot on the plans) paved multi-use path that will include a public use easement beginning at the end of the cul-de-sac on "Road D." This path will meander northward and through the 150 foot wide arterial road buffer to the western common project boundary with Somerset. The trail is intended to connect at the common property boundary with the Raintree Forest subdivision, east of the project, wind through the open space and terminate at the western property boundary, adjacent to Crockett Road, which is shared with the Somerset subdivision. If the project is approved, staff believes a contribution of funds by the developer for the construction of a public, multi-use trail adjacent to Crockett Road and extending across the front of Somerset would be appropriate. This trail extension would allow for safe pedestrian access by residents of the proposed subdivision to a signalized intersection and pedestrian crossing to the nearby schools and Crockett Park. The estimated cost of this improvement is approximately $25,000 and would possibly require acquisition of an easement by the City across that portion of the Somerset open space fronting Crockett Road. If this trail improvement is constructed, staff would also recommend that the City eventually negotiate with the Raintree Forest HOA to undertake a project to connect the existing public trail along Raintree Parkway to the Holt/Witherspoon property development across Raintree Forest open space to provide a complete public, off-road trail connection from Raintree Parkway to the nearby schools and Crockett Park.  At the time a connection is made to the City's existing trail along Raintree Parkway, the trail within the proposed new subdivision would functionally become a part of the City's trail system and the City would assume future maintenance responsibility.

The proposed plan shows two vehicle access points into the project. The primary access is situated on Crockett Road and aligns centerline to centerline with Arrowhead Drive. A secondary access is proposed on Ansley Lane, on the west side of the project, approximately 650 feet south of its intersection with Aberdeen Drive.  The plan also proposes the dedication of an additional 20 feet of right-of-way along the south side of Crockett Road.  

The property is bisected by two electrical transmission line easements. The first is approximately 175 feet wide, and cuts through the northwest corner of the site. The second is approximately 200 feet wide, dividing the southern portion of the property. 

There is also a small cemetery, which will be preserved as part of the development of the property.  The cemetery is located in the northern portion of the site, across from the intersection of Crockett Road and Arrowhead Drive. The cemetery contains the graves of four decedents.  The plan proposes surrounding the cemetery with three foot tall, wrought iron look, steel fencing and a gate that has been powder coated to protect against the elements.  


The submitted plan does not propose additional landscaping across the front of the Holtland/Wildwood site, within the arterial road buffer adjacent to Crockett Road, in an attempt to preserve the view of the site and it's historic character.  If the proposed rezoning is approved, and upon review of the preliminary plan by the Planning Commission,  the landscaping that is required in the area will be distributed in alternate areas of the project as permitted by Section 78-512(b)5c of the tree preservation requirements of the Municipal Code.  

Finally, depending upon the design of the shared driveway easement serving lots 46 through 49, additional residential driveway standards related to access for emergency vehicles as defined by Section 78-486(14) of the Municipal Code will apply.  This section requires that the width for the driveway shall be increased to 12 feet and provisions shall be made for turnouts every 500 feet in length to facilitate access by fire engines and two-way vehicle circulation when the dwelling is located 500 feet from the street. 

R-2 Plan
For comparative purposes, the developer has submitted a concept plan reflecting development of the property under the existing R-2 zoning classification.  This plan would yield an estimated 141 lots, including several larger lots located within the HP overlay in the southeast corner of the project area. The OSRD development plan has been designed to preserve much of this area. The R-2 concept plan is attached.

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY (TIS)
A revised traffic impact study (TIS), dated July, 2015, was included as part of the initial submittal. A copy of the TIS was forwarded to Mr. Greg Judy with Neel-Shaffer Inc., who assists staff in the review of the documents submitted for rezoning actions. The applicant will pay for the Neel-Shaffer review per the requirements of Section 50-29(b) of the Municipal Code.  Mr. Judy's review comments are attached. 

Although not referenced in the rezoning application, the possibility of the need for a traffic signal at the subdivision entrance on Crockett Road opposite Arrowhead Drive has been raised.  Staff has not been consulted about this proposal, but would be opposed to a signal at this location.  The City follows established traffic engineering standards found in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) when considering whether a traffic signal is warranted at a given location.  Both the existing and projected traffic volumes at the proposed subdivision entrance location, even including the Arrowhead Drive traffic, come nowhere near meeting any of the MUTCD traffic signal warrants.  The developer’s own traffic study never mentions or proposes signalizing this intersection.  Instead, the study recommends a two way stop on the side roads with no stop control on Crockett Road.  Staff asked Greg Judy with Neel-Schaffer to address the negative consequences of installing a signal when not warranted by actual traffic flow as part of his review of the TIS.  Mr. Judy's full response on this issue is included in the attached report, but excerpts of his response are as follows:
 

It is important to mention that signalization should be reserved for locations where it can be demonstrated through engineering analysis that there is a need for this level of control. Installing traffic signals at intersections where conditions do not meet documented industry standards often result in unfavorable operational and safety consequences.

Experience and study have shown that implementing signalization at intersections not meeting minimum thresholds often has overall detrimental impacts on the road network. Although it may seem to resolve specific traffic concerns, unwarranted traffic signals often have opposite and unintended consequences:
  • Unnecessary delay and vehicle queuing for traffic on Crockett Road. The traffic study for the proposed project predicts only around 10% of all traffic passing through the intersection will originate via the northbound approach of the access roadway. The natural cycling of the traffic signal phases will cause excessive stop-and-go operation and interruption of traffic flow on Crockett Road in order to service a low-volume side street.
  • Heightened exposure to crashes. The likelihood of additional and more severe crashes may be expected.
  • Operational inefficiency during off-peak hours. A traffic signal will not provide added operational benefit during most hours of the day. Analysis shows two-way stop control has less intrusive impact on traffic flow with higher operating efficiencies for all entering traffic movements.
  • Unnecessary operating and maintenance costs

Neel-Shaffer agrees with the opinions of staff that traffic signalization would not be an appropriate traffic control measure for the primary access intersection. 

Generally, the review completed by Neel-Shaffer concurs with the recommendations stated in the traffic study, which are detailed below.  In addition to the study’s identified improvements for the primary access at Crockett Road across from Arrowhead Drive, Neel-Shaffer recommended installation of an eastbound left-turn lane on Crockett Road at the primary entrance point. The presence of this turn lane would enhance safety and efficient traffic operations on Crockett Road. 

Trip Generation
The trip generation calculations were based on the regression equations and the rates provided by Trip Generation,Ninth Edition published by the Institute of Traffic Engineers.  The revised TIS trip generation estimates are shown in the table below:

 
Land Use # Lots/Units Daily
Traffic
Generated Traffic
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Enter Exit Enter Exit
Single Family -- Based on equations 153 1,554 29 88 97 57

The above trip generation rates were used to complete the trip assignment and capacity analysis for the proposed project. 

Capacity Analysis 
In order to identify the projected peak hour traffic volumes at the completion of the proposed project, the trips generated by the proposed development were added to the existing peak hour traffic volumes in the study area.

Using the total projected peak hour traffic volumes, capacity analyses were conducted in order to compare existing conditions with projected post-development conditions to determine the impact of the proposed project on the roadway system. Specifically, the need for roadway and traffic control improvements within the study area was evaluated. I
t was assumed that the project access will be constructed directly opposite Arrowhead Drive and will include one southbound entering lane and two northbound exiting lanes, striped as a separate left turn lane and a shared through/right turn lane. Also, it was assumed that an eastbound right turn lane and a westbound left turn lane will be provided on Crockett Road at the new access. Finally, it was assumed that all existing roadway geometry and traffic control will be maintained and no improvements will be provided.

The capacity analysis indicates that, at the signalized intersection of Wilson Pike and Crockett Road, the westbound left turns onto southbound Wilson Pike will continue to operate poorly during the AM peak hour as it does under existing conditions. Also, the westbound vehicle queue will continue to extend beyond the existing crossing over the railroad tracks, approaching the intersection with Volunteer Parkway/Aberdeen Drive. However, these conditions will continue to occur during the peak hours of traffic operations at Crockett Elementary School and Woodland Middle School. During the PM peak hour, all of the turning movements at this intersection are expected to operate with acceptable delays and vehicle queues. Also, the capacity analysis indicate that, at the signalized intersection of Crockett Road and Volunteer Parkway/Aberdeen Drive, all of the turning movements will continue to operate with acceptable delays and vehicle queues during both peak hours.

At the intersection of Crockett Road, Arrowhead Drive and the project access, most of the turning movementswill operate with acceptable delays and vehicle queues during both peak hours. Although the northbound left turns are expected to operate poorly during both peak hours, the vehicle queues are expected to be low. However, based on these results, additional analyses were conducted in order to identify how well this intersection would operate if all-way stop control were provided. The results indicate that, with all-way stop control at this intersection, the westbound turning movements will operate poorly during the AM peak hour, and the reciprocal eastbound turning movements will operate poorly during the PM peak hour.

At the unsignalized intersection of Crockett Road and Raintree Parkway/Green Hill Boulevard, most of the turning movements will continue to operate with acceptable delays and vehicle queues during both peak hours. However, the westbound turning movements will continue to operate poorly during the AM peak hour, and the reciprocal movement, the eastbound turning movements, will continue to operate poorly during the PM peak hour.

TIS Conclusions and Recommendations
The TIS concluded that the proposed project will have a relatively minor impact on the intersections and roadways within the study area. However, in order to provide safe and efficient traffic operations at the project access, directly opposite Arrowhead Drive, the following improvements should be provided at this intersection:
  1. The new internal roadway should be constructed to include one southbound entering and two northbound existing lanes, stripped as a separate left turn land and a shared through/right turn lane.  The northbound left turn lane should be designed and constructed to include at least 100 feet of storage, and the northbound right turn lane should be designed and constructed to include at least 75 feet of storage.
  2. An eastbound right turn lane should be constructed on Crockett Road at the new roadway. This turn lane should include at least 125 feet of storage and should be designed and constructed according to AASHTO standards.  Note that the City's traffic engineer also recommends an eastbound left turn lane at this intersection and staff concurs with this recommendation.  If sufficient right of way is not available to provide both eastbound left and right turn lanes at this intersection, staff believes the eastbound left turn lane is a higher priority and provides greater benefit to the overall road network in this area.
  3. A westbound left turn lane should be constructed on Crockett Road at the new roadway. This turn lane should include at least 75 feet of storage and should be designed and constructed according to AASHTO standards.
  4. Although the traffic volumes on Crockett Road have remained relatively stable since 2007 adequate right-of-way should be reserved along the northern frontage of the project site in order to accommodate any future widening of Crockett Road to a three-lane cross section.
Schools
The developer has submitted to the proposed plan to Ms. Allison Nunley with Williamson County Schools (WCS) for an assessment as to the impact of the proposed development on the schools in the area.

WCS staff reviewed enrollment numbers and projections for neighborhoods of similar size in the Crockett Elementary, Woodland Middle and Ravenwood High school zones.  For 154 lots, which includes the R-2 lot, WCS projects a total enrollment of 147 students at full buildout. The student breakdown is as follows.
  • Elementary = 62
  • Middle = 39
  • High = 46

Current capacity and enrollment numbers for the three impacted schools are as follows:  Crockett Elementary (870 capacity /674 enrolled), Woodland Middle (975/877), and Ravenwood High (1,649/2,113).  Note that Ravenwood's enrollment number will be impacted downward when the new Nolensville High School opens in fall of 2016.

Utilities
The tract proposed for rezoning is within the Brentwood Water Services service area for both water and sewer.  The sewer impact of the proposed 154 lots has been analyzed by the sewer system computer model.  The result of this analysis shows that the estimated 47,740 gallons per day (310 gpd per house X 154 lots) can be accommodated by the existing sewer infrastructure without offsite capacity improvements being required.  However, connection to the City's existing gravity sewer system will require the developer to extend public sewer offsite to the nearest existing manhole at the developer's expense. 

Existing water service is also adequate to serve the proposed development, provided, however, that individual booster pumps will be required for several homes at the higher elevations in order to ensure adequate water pressure.  These booster pumps will be installed as part of home construction on these lots.

Historic Background
The submitted plan proposes the preservation of the historic Holtland/Wildwood home, which was built circa 1835, situated on a 1,200 acre plantation. In March 2000, the Board of Commissioners approved Resolution 2000-11, which designated certain historic sites as significant. Holtland/Wildwood was included as part of the designation. A copy of the resolution is attached. The home has not been lived is since the early 1960's. Much of the original acreage has been sold. The two-story home is constructed of brick and includes the original two-story brick ell at the rear and several connected outbuildings. In the 1800's, Thomas Holt acquired several hundred acres in the Crockett Road area of what is now Brentwood. His grandson, John Page Holt, lived on the property with his wife, O'Delle K. Holt, during the 1900's.  For more information on the history of the tract, please refer to the attachment below. 

Rezoning Procedure
The proposed ordinance was approved on first reading on September 14, 2015.  The community meeting was conducted on October 1, 2015 at the Brentwood Library, beginning at 6:00 p.m.
  The Planning Commission completed its review and recommendation of the proposed plan at its regular meeting of October 5, 2015. Second and final reading is scheduled for October 26, 2015. 

If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact the Planning and Codes Director. 
10/26/2015:CC  Ordinance 2015-12 - Second and Final Reading Rezoning Approximately 261 Acres, Located on the South Side of Crockett Road, from R-2 to OSRD  Planning & Codes
  Second and final reading of Ordinance 2015-12, which proposes the rezoning of 261.04 acres of land, located at 9305 Crockett Road. The subject property includes the historic Holtland/Wildwood home. 

Mike Ford Custom Builders LLC Homes recently completed  negotiations to buy the property for $10.5 million. The purchase price is based on an assumed development lot yield of up to 127 lots under the existing R-2 zoning designation for the property. The contract stipulates that should the buyer receive City approval of a development plan providing for more than 127 lots, the final purchase price would be increased by $35,000 for each additional lot above 127. The buyer plans to partner with CPS Land, LLC to develop the property.  Closing on the sale of the property is to occur no later than January 19, 2016.  Mr. Charles Witherspoon, who currently resides on the property will retain a life estate in his existing residence. 

A previous OSRD rezoning proposal was presented for City Commission consideration in January 2015 under Ordinance 2014-21 but failed to win approval.  That proposal included a total project area of 263.98 acres. The current proposal includes a total proposed rezoning area of 261.04 acres.  The difference relates to the desire of the developer to retain one lot located in the NW corner of the property under the current R-2 zoning classification. The lot includes an area of 2.94 acres and is located between the western property boundary and the TVA easement, adjacent to Crockett Road 

 
Changes Since First Reading
Since first reading, which occurred on September 14, the developer has submitted several changes to the plan. There are several associated changes due to the area of the property that is to retain the R-2 zoning classification being increased a total of 0.32 acres, or from the original area of 2.94 acres to a new area of 3.26 acres. The proposed changes relate to the desire to maintain a lot size that would facilitate the keeping of farm animals. Section 10-4 of the Municipal Code requires a lot area of at least three acres in order to keep livestock or fowl. The increase in the R-2 lot resulted in a decrease in the OSRD project area of 0.32 acres or from the original total of 261.04 acres to a new total of 260.72 acres. Other minor changes to the plan include:
  1. A decrease in the area of dedicated ROW for Crockett Road from 1.35 ac, to 1.33 ac.;
  2. A decrease in the total developable land area from 243.83 ac. to 243.53 ac.;
  3. A decrease in the total usable land area from 221.52 ac. to 221.22 ac.;
  4. A decrease in the dedicated open space from 104.46 ac. to 104.16 ac.;
  5. A reduction in area for open space "Q", which is adjacent to the R-2 lot, from 28.42 ac. to 28.11 ac.; and
  6. A change to the property description, resulting from the R-2 lot modification. Ordinance 2015-12, attached below has been updated with the revised description.
The area of the OSRD lots remained unchanged from the original submittal.

In addition to the items noted above, staff and the City's traffic engineer have continued to work with the applicant to evaluate the potential for a roundabout at the proposed Crockett Road entrance to the subdivision in lieu of a two-way stop. After further survey work, preliminary design, and traffic capacity analysis, all parties believe that a roundabout is a viable option at this location. (See attached roundabout analysis report.)  On October 16, the applicant's engineer submitted a revised OSRD Development Plan that includes the roundabout in Crockett Road at the intersection of Arrowhead Drive and the new internal street (Attachment B -- Revised -- 10-16-2015).  Note that the inclusion of the roundabout was also a recommendation from the Planning Commission.   
  
The proposed roundabout has been placed south of the existing Crockett Road alignment (further into the Holt property) to limit conflicts with the two developed corner lots on the east and west sides of Arrowhead Drive at its intersection with Crockett Road. However, inclusion of the roundabout and its proposed location has created an issue related to the width of the required arterial road buffer along the south side of Crockett Road. The OSRD ordinance requires that a 150 foot wide landscaped buffer strip be included as part of OSRD developments that border an arterial road. Including the roundabout and shifting its location to the south has the potential to reduce the width of the buffer depending on how the ROW point is measured. The revised plan attached below reflects the buffer width being measured from the right-of-way (ROW) line along the south side of Crockett Road as proposed originally on first reading, including the 20 ft. ROW dedication.  Also attached is an exhibit that shows the proposed ROW dedication and a depiction of the buffer if it is measured from the outside travel lane of the proposed roundabout.  If the width of the arterial road buffer is measured from the outside travel lane on the roundabout, the proposed lots along "Road A", which include lots 2 through 5 and 147 through 153 will be affected.  Additionally, an existing tree line that is to be preserved as part of the development of lot 5 will be impacted.  

Section 78-184(b)1 of the Zoning Ordinance provides that "The right-of-way of the arterial street from which the buffer strip is measured shall be determined by the planning commission and shall include any dedications of property for widening and other improvements."  Should the Board of Commissioners endorse the revised plan on second and final reading, the Planning Commission will consider the changes and determine the ROW from which the buffer is to be measured when the preliminary plan is presented for review. The wording of the section infers that the Planning Commission does have some authority to interpret the point of measurement for the arterial road buffer.  As this is the first time a new roundabout on an arterial road is being proposed as part of an OSRD development plan, there is no prior precedent for determining this point of measurement for a roundabout. Should the Planning Commission require the full width buffer as measured from the outside of the southern roundabout travel lane, a revised OSRD Development Plan reflecting the shifted locations of the impacted lots will have to be prepared and eventually submitted for approval by the Board of Commissioners following review by the Planning Commission.  If this occurs, it is not expected to change the number of proposed lots in the development. 

On September 15, planning staff discussed the proposed preservation plan for Holtland/Wildwood with the Historic Commission. The Commission provided a total of four recommendations, which follow.  


 
  1. Moved to accept the OSRD plan;
  2. Moved to require developer to use “Saving the Farmstead” for the historic house.  
  3. Moved that the developer be required to verify the existence of unmarked cemetery that is starred on the map and preserved under state Law.  
  4. Moved for the Brentwood Historic Commission to review restrictive covenants after the city attorney reviews them.
A copy of the meeting minutes from the September 15, 2015 meeting is attached below.  

OSRD Plan Summary
Ragan Smith Associates and CPS Land have submitted a proposed plan showing a total of 153 OSRD-compliant lots, including a large lot that includes Wildwood and the current Witherspoon residence.  The site specifics are detailed in the following table:    

 
DETAIL AREA (SF) AREA (AC)
Area of Project   261.04
Number of Proposed Lots -- OSRD 153
Number of Potential Lots -- R-2 141
Density (Dwelling Units per Acre) -- R-2 0.53 DUPA
Average Lot Size -- OSRD 39,681 0.91
Largest Lot Size -- OSRD 367,940 8.45
Smallest Lot Size -- OSRD 17,600 0.40
Excess Open Space Provided -- OSRD 3,956,990 90.84
Density (Dwelling Units per Acre) -- OSRD 0.59 DUPA

The largest lot, identified in the table above, is the site of the historic Holtland/Wildwood Home. The sale agreement includes a provision requiring the buyer to use its experience in restoration and residential construction to manage and use the resources necessary to finance the preservation of the historic mansion and grounds prior to selling the property to a third party.

 
The plan proposes the preservation of approximately 7.45 acres around the historic home, not including the one acre allocated to the historic home itself as part of Lot 1. The proposed historic preservation area also includes the existing Witherspoon residence. Section 78-198(1)c of the Municipal Code allows for increased lot sizes adjacent to historically significant sites (as designated by the Board of Commissioners) to promote the restoration and/or preserve the integrity of the historic site. The additional acreage, in excess of one acre, can be credited as permanently dedicated open space. Any historic structure used as a residential dwelling must be counted toward the total number of dwelling units permitted in the development. The development must be configured to be compatible in architectural style, size, scale and orientation with the historically significant site and structures. Additionally, the proposed preservation plan must be submitted to the Historic Commission for its review and recommendations prior to formal approval of the development plan by the Board of Commissioners. A similar situation occurred in Inglehame Farms, where a total of 9.09 acres was preserved around the historic mansion there.

The southeastern portion of the project is encumbered by the Hillside Protection (HP) Overlay. The area includes steep hillside areas in excess of 15% and elevations of 850 feet and above.  Lots in this area will meet the three acre size requirement as required by Code.  Planning Commission approval of HP site plans, which would include elevations, is required before building permits will be issued for these HP designated lots.  The OSRD plan also shows a hiking trail that meanders up the hill in this area.  

The proposed plan also provides for a ten foot wide (incorrectly shown as eight foot on the plans) paved multi-use path that will include a public use easement beginning at the end of the cul-de-sac on "Road D." This path will meander northward and through the 150 foot wide arterial road buffer to the western common project boundary with Somerset. The trail is intended to connect at the common property boundary with the Raintree Forest subdivision, east of the project, wind through the open space and terminate at the western property boundary, adjacent to Crockett Road, which is shared with the Somerset subdivision. If the project is approved, staff believes a contribution of funds by the developer for the construction of a public, multi-use trail adjacent to Crockett Road and extending across the front of Somerset would be appropriate. This trail extension would allow for safe pedestrian access by residents of the proposed subdivision to a signalized intersection and pedestrian crossing to the nearby schools and Crockett Park. The estimated cost of this improvement is approximately $25,000 and would possibly require acquisition of an easement by the City across that portion of the Somerset open space fronting Crockett Road. If this trail improvement is constructed, staff would also recommend that the City eventually negotiate with the Raintree Forest HOA to undertake a project to connect the existing public trail along Raintree Parkway to the Holt/Witherspoon property development across Raintree Forest open space to provide a complete public, off-road trail connection from Raintree Parkway to the nearby schools and Crockett Park.  At the time a connection is made to the City's existing trail along Raintree Parkway, the trail within the proposed new subdivision would functionally become a part of the City's trail system and the City would assume future maintenance responsibility.

The proposed plan shows two vehicle access points into the project. The primary access is situated on Crockett Road and aligns centerline to centerline with Arrowhead Drive. A secondary access is proposed on Ansley Lane, on the west side of the project, approximately 650 feet south of its intersection with Aberdeen Drive.  The plan also proposes the dedication of an additional 20 feet of right-of-way along the south side of Crockett Road.  

The property is bisected by two electrical transmission line easements. The first is approximately 175 feet wide, and cuts through the northwest corner of the site. The second is approximately 200 feet wide, dividing the southern portion of the property. 

There is also a small cemetery, which will be preserved as part of the development of the property.  The cemetery is located in the northern portion of the site, across from the intersection of Crockett Road and Arrowhead Drive. The cemetery contains the graves of four decedents.  The plan proposes surrounding the cemetery with three foot tall, wrought iron look, steel fencing and a gate that has been powder coated to protect against the elements.  


The submitted plan does not propose additional landscaping across the front of the Holtland/Wildwood site, within the arterial road buffer adjacent to Crockett Road, in an attempt to preserve the view of the site and it's historic character.  If the proposed rezoning is approved, and upon review of the preliminary plan by the Planning Commission,  the landscaping that is required in the area will be distributed in alternate areas of the project as permitted by Section 78-512(b)5c of the tree preservation requirements of the Municipal Code.  

Finally, depending upon the design of the shared driveway easement serving lots 46 through 49, additional residential driveway standards related to access for emergency vehicles as defined by Section 78-486(14) of the Municipal Code will apply.  This section requires that the width for the driveway shall be increased to 12 feet and provisions shall be made for turnouts every 500 feet in length to facilitate access by fire engines and two-way vehicle circulation when the dwelling is located 500 feet from the street. 

R-2 Plan
For comparative purposes, the developer has submitted a concept plan reflecting development of the property under the existing R-2 zoning classification.  This plan would yield an estimated 141 lots, including several larger lots located within the HP overlay in the southeast corner of the project area. The OSRD development plan has been designed to preserve much of this area. The R-2 concept plan is attached.

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY (TIS)
A revised traffic impact study (TIS), dated July, 2015, was included as part of the initial submittal. A copy of the TIS was forwarded to Mr. Greg Judy with Neel-Shaffer Inc., who assists staff in the review of the documents submitted for rezoning actions. The applicant will pay for the Neel-Shaffer review per the requirements of Section 50-29(b) of the Municipal Code.  Mr. Judy's review comments are attached. 

Although not referenced in the rezoning application, the possibility of the need for a traffic signal at the subdivision entrance on Crockett Road opposite Arrowhead Drive has been raised.  Staff has not been consulted about this proposal, but would be opposed to a signal at this location.  The City follows established traffic engineering standards found in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) when considering whether a traffic signal is warranted at a given location.  Both the existing and projected traffic volumes at the proposed subdivision entrance location, even including the Arrowhead Drive traffic, come nowhere near meeting any of the MUTCD traffic signal warrants.  The developer’s own traffic study never mentions or proposes signalizing this intersection.  Instead, the study recommends a two way stop on the side roads with no stop control on Crockett Road.  Staff asked Greg Judy with Neel-Schaffer to address the negative consequences of installing a signal when not warranted by actual traffic flow as part of his review of the TIS.  Mr. Judy's full response on this issue is included in the attached report, but excerpts of his response are as follows:

It is important to mention that signalization should be reserved for locations where it can be demonstrated through engineering analysis that there is a need for this level of control. Installing traffic signals at intersections where conditions do not meet documented industry standards often result in unfavorable operational and safety consequences.

Experience and study have shown that implementing signalization at intersections not meeting minimum thresholds often has overall detrimental impacts on the road network. Although it may seem to resolve specific traffic concerns, unwarranted traffic signals often have opposite and unintended consequences:
  •  Unnecessary delay and vehicle queuing for traffic on Crockett Road. The traffic study for the proposed project predicts only around 10% of all traffic passing through the intersection will originate via the northbound approach of the access roadway. The natural cycling of the traffic signal phases will cause excessive stop-and-go operation and interruption of traffic flow on Crockett Road in order to service a low-volume side street.
  • Heightened exposure to crashes. The likelihood of additional and more severe crashes may be expected.
  • Operational inefficiency during off-peak hours. A traffic signal will not provide added operational benefit during most hours of the day. Analysis shows two-way stop control has less intrusive impact on traffic flow with higher operating efficiencies for all entering traffic movements.
  • Unnecessary operating and maintenance costs.

Neel-Shaffer agrees with the opinions of staff that traffic signalization would not be an appropriate traffic control measure for the primary access intersection. 

Generally, the review completed by Neel-Shaffer concurs with the recommendations stated in the traffic study, which are detailed below.  In addition to the study’s identified improvements for the primary access at Crockett Road across from Arrowhead Drive, Neel-Shaffer recommended installation of an eastbound left-turn lane on Crockett Road at the primary entrance point. The presence of this turn lane would enhance safety and efficient traffic operations on Crockett Road. 

Trip Generation

The trip generation calculations were based on the regression equations and the rates provided by Trip Generation,Ninth Edition published by the Institute of Traffic Engineers.  The revised TIS trip generation estimates are shown in the table below:

 
Land Use # Lots/Units Daily
Traffic
Generated Traffic
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Enter Exit Enter Exit
Single Family -- Based on equations 153 1,554 29 88 97 57

The above trip generation rates were used to complete the trip assignment and capacity analysis for the proposed project. 

Capacity Analysis 
In order to identify the projected peak hour traffic volumes at the completion of the proposed project, the trips generated by the proposed development were added to the existing peak hour traffic volumes in the study area.

Using the total projected peak hour traffic volumes, capacity analyses were conducted in order to compare existing conditions with projected post-development conditions to determine the impact of the proposed project on the roadway system. Specifically, the need for roadway and traffic control improvements within the study area was evaluated. I
t was assumed that the project access will be constructed directly opposite Arrowhead Drive and will include one southbound entering lane and two northbound exiting lanes, striped as a separate left turn lane and a shared through/right turn lane. Also, it was assumed that an eastbound right turn lane and a westbound left turn lane will be provided on Crockett Road at the new access. Finally, it was assumed that all existing roadway geometry and traffic control will be maintained and no improvements will be provided.

The capacity analysis indicates that, at the signalized intersection of Wilson Pike and Crockett Road, the westbound left turns onto southbound Wilson Pike will continue to operate poorly during the AM peak hour as it does under existing conditions. Also, the westbound vehicle queue will continue to extend beyond the existing crossing over the railroad tracks, approaching the intersection with Volunteer Parkway/Aberdeen Drive. However, these conditions will continue to occur during the peak hours of traffic operations at Crockett Elementary School and Woodland Middle School. During the PM peak hour, all of the turning movements at this intersection are expected to operate with acceptable delays and vehicle queues. Also, the capacity analysis indicate that, at the signalized intersection of Crockett Road and Volunteer Parkway/Aberdeen Drive, all of the turning movements will continue to operate with acceptable delays and vehicle queues during both peak hours.

At the intersection of Crockett Road, Arrowhead Drive and the project access, most of the turning movementswill operate with acceptable delays and vehicle queues during both peak hours. Although the northbound left turns are expected to operate poorly during both peak hours, the vehicle queues are expected to be low. However, based on these results, additional analyses were conducted in order to identify how well this intersection would operate if all-way stop control were provided. The results indicate that, with all-way stop control at this intersection, the westbound turning movements will operate poorly during the AM peak hour, and the reciprocal eastbound turning movements will operate poorly during the PM peak hour.

At the unsignalized intersection of Crockett Road and Raintree Parkway/Green Hill Boulevard, most of the turning movements will continue to operate with acceptable delays and vehicle queues during both peak hours. However, the westbound turning movements will continue to operate poorly during the AM peak hour, and the reciprocal movement, the eastbound turning movements, will continue to operate poorly during the PM peak hour.

TIS Conclusions and Recommendations
The TIS concluded that the proposed project will have a relatively minor impact on the intersections and roadways within the study area. However, in order to provide safe and efficient traffic operations at the project access, directly opposite Arrowhead Drive, the following improvements should be provided at this intersection:
  1. The new internal roadway should be constructed to include one southbound entering and two northbound existing lanes, stripped as a separate left turn land and a shared through/right turn lane.  The northbound left turn lane should be designed and constructed to include at least 100 feet of storage, and the northbound right turn land should be designed and constructed to include at least 75 feet of storage.
  2. An eastbound right turn lane should be constructed on Crockett Road at the new roadway. This turn lane should include at least 125 feet of storage and should be designed and constructed according to AASHTO standards.  Note that the City's traffic engineer also recommends an eastbound left turn lane at this intersection and staff concurs with this recommendation.  If sufficient right of way is not available to provide both eastbound left and right turn lanes at this intersection, staff believes the eastbound left turn lane is a higher priority and provides greater benefit to the overall road network in this area.
  3. A westbound left turn lane should be constructed on Crockett Road at the new roadway. This turn lane should include at least 75 feet of storage and should be designed and constructed according to AASHTO standards.
  4. Although the traffic volumes on Crockett Road have remained relatively stable since 2007 adequate right-of-way should be reserved along the northern frontage of the project site in order to accommodate any future widening of Crockett Road to a three-lane cross section.
Schools
The developer has submitted to the proposed plan to Ms. Allison Nunley with Williamson County Schools (WCS) for an assessment as to the impact of the proposed development on the schools in the area.

WCS staff reviewed enrollment numbers and projections for neighborhoods of similar size in the Crockett Elementary, Woodland Middle and Ravenwood High school zones.  For 154 lots, which includes the R-2 lot, WCS projects a total enrollment of 147 students at full buildout. The student breakdown is as follows.
  • Elementary = 62
  • Middle = 39
  • High = 46

     
 
  WCS SCHOOL CAPACITY (AFFECTED SCHOOLS)
SCHOOL CAPACITY ENROLLMENT
Crockett Elem. 870 674
Woodland Middle 975 877
Ravenwood H.S. 1,649 2,113

Ravenwood's enrollment number will be impacted downward when the new Nolensville High School opens in the fall of 2016.

Utilities
The tract proposed for rezoning is within the Brentwood Water Services service area for both water and sewer.  The sewer impact of the proposed 154 lots has been analyzed by the sewer system computer model.  The result of this analysis shows that the estimated 47,740 gallons per day (310 gpd per house X 154 lots) can be accommodated by the existing sewer infrastructure without offsite capacity improvements being required.  However, connection to the City's existing gravity sewer system will require the developer to extend public sewer offsite to the nearest existing manhole at the developer's expense. 

Existing water service is also adequate to serve the proposed development, provided, however, that individual booster pumps will be required for several homes at the higher elevations in order to ensure adequate water pressure.  These booster pumps will be installed as part of home construction on these lots.


Historic Background
The submitted plan proposes the preservation of the historic Holtland/Wildwood home, which was built circa 1835, situated on a 1,200 acre plantation. In March 2000, the Board of Commissioners approved Resolution 2000-11, which designated certain historic sites as significant. Holtland/Wildwood was included as part of the designation. A copy of the resolution is attached. The home has not been lived is since the early 1960's. Much of the original acreage has been sold. The two-story home is constructed of brick and includes the original two-story brick ell at the rear and several connected outbuildings. In the 1800's, Thomas Holt acquired several hundred acres in the Crockett Road area of what is now Brentwood. His grandson, John Page Holt, lived on the property with his wife, O'Delle K. Holt, during the 1900's.  For more information on the history of the tract, please refer to the attachment below. 

Rezoning Procedure
The proposed ordinance was approved on first reading on September 14, 2015. The community meeting was conducted on October 1, 2015 at the Brentwood Library, beginning at 6:00 p.m. A total of 24 citizens attended the meeting.  The topic that generated the bulk of the discussion was related to traffic concerns. The Planning Commission completed its review and recommendation of the proposed plan at its regular meeting of October 5, 2015.
As part of their review, it was recommended that the roundabout design as presented at the meeting, be incorporated into the revised OSRD Development Plan presented to the Board of Commissioners on second and final reading. The approval memorandum is attached below.

If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact the Planning and Codes Director. 
12/07/2015:PC  BPC1511-010 Preliminary Plan - Witherspoon Property, 9305 Crockett Road, Zoning OSRD 
  BPC1511-010 Preliminary Plan - Witherspoon Property, 9305 Crockett Road, Zoning OSRD • Plan proposed 153 lots on 260.72 acres • One R-2 compliant lot is proposed havening an area of 3.26 ac in the NW corner of the property • roundabout in Crockett Road included. • Excess open space has increases from approved rezoning plan from 90.44 ac. to 90.46 ac. due to a decrease in the area of the internal streets • Total area in lots has also been adjusted from 139.37 to 138.58, which also affects the open space required • Open space provided has been adjusted from 104.07 ac. To 104.88 ac.
03/07/2016:PC  BPC1512-011 Revised Preliminary Plan, Open Space Modifications in the roundabout - Owl Creek Subdivision, Phase One, Zoning OSRD 
  BPC1512-011 Revised Preliminary Plan, Open Space Modifications in the roundabout - Owl Creek Subdivision, Phase One, Zoning OSRD - Applicant: Mr. Michael Dewey, Dewey - Estes Engineering, 2925 Berry Hill Drive, Nashville, TN 37204
03/14/2016:CC  Resolution 2016-13 - Authorizing Agreement with Neel-Schaffer, Inc. for Design Services for a roundabout at Crockett Road/Green Hill Boulevard  Engineering
  Resolution 2016-13 - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT WITH NEEL-SCHAFFER, INC. FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR A roundabout AT CROCKETT ROAD AND GREEN HILL BOULEVARD, for adoption
03/28/2016:CC  Resolution 2016-14 - A Resolution Authorizing Changes to the OSRD-IP Development Plan for the Owl Creek Subdivision  Planning & Codes
  The attached resolution provides for the approval of minor alterations to the previously approved OSRD-IP development plan for the Owl Creek Subdivision. The project is located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Concord and Waller Roads, east of the Chestnut Springs Subdivision.

The plan proposes a revised design 
of the improvements within the island located in the roundabout at the intersection of Glenmore Lane and Cressy Lane.  There is a small center landscape island within the roundabout that will be enlarged from 10 feet to 15 feet in diameter to accommodate the proposed improvements.  The existing roundabout is designed as an "urban roundabout" per the Subdivision  Regulations and requires a 52 foot diameter central island.  The proposed improvements include:

 
  1. Installation of an 18-inch tall knee wall with a stone veneer to match the existing entry features.  The wall will be finished with an 18-inch wide cast concrete cap;
  2. Construction of a wood Aabor, measuring 7 feet tall, 30 inches wide and 10 feet long.  The finish will match the existing entry features;
  3. Acid etching will be used to stain and create a pattern in the existing concrete apron.  The final color will match that of the existing stonework at the entrance to the subdivision. The mountable curb will not be stained;
  4. The proposed landscaping installation includes shrubs and ground cover, and
  5. The addition of a total of 54.0 square feet of excess green space to the project (0.001 acres).
The open space as shown on the currently approved OSRD-IP Development Plan includes a total of 2,443,716 square feet (56.100 acres).  The proposed plan shows 2,443,770 square feet (56.101 acres). This number represents 67% of the total project area.  A total of 65% of permanent open space is required by Code.  

Because the proposal increases the area of the open space provided, and the improvements within that open space, approval of the revised OSRD-IP Development Plan by the Board of Commissioners is necessary, per the requirements of Section 78-185(b)2 of the Municipal Code.

On March 7, 2016 the Planning Commission voted unanimously seven for and zero against (7-0), to approve a revised preliminary plan for the subdivision.  As part of the approval, the Planning Commission also voted, seven for and zero against (7-0) to forward a recommendation of approval of the corresponding revisions to the OSRD-IP Development Plan to the Board of Commissioners. 

Please contact the Planning and Codes Director should you have any questions.
04/25/2016:CC  Resolution 2016-24 -- A Resolution Authorizing Changes to the OSRD Development Plan for the Morgan Farms Subdivision  Planning & Codes
  On February 23, 2015 the Board of Commissioners approved Resolution 2015-, which authorized revisions to the OSRD Development Plan for the Morgan Farms Subdivision.  The changes included:

 
  1. Added a detention pond in Open Space "I". The area is currently within a scenic easement and is located south of lots 234 through 237, in Section Two;
  2. Removed three lots and renumbered the lots in the area, omitting numbers 14, 15 and 16, in Section Three;
  3. Revised the phase line in Open Space "L" to allow for two additional lots (#208 & #209) along the east side of Barnstaple Lane in Section Five. The lots will be added to Section Six. Revised roundabout right-of-way, edge of pavement, and sidewalks per approved construction plans. Renumbered the lots in Section Six to numbers in the 200’s.
  4. The excess open space area for the project was decreased by 0.09 acres (3,920 sq. ft.).
On August 25, 2014 the Board of Commissioners voted to approve Resolution 2014-60 for the Morgan Farms Subdivision. The Resolution authorized construction of a rolling landscaped berm in Open Space F, which is part of the arterial road buffer along Split Log Road. 

On May 27, 2014 the Board of Commissioners approved Resolution 2014-36, which proposed an increase in the amount of excess open space for the project from 15.02 acre to 15.06 acres. 


On December 9, 2013 the Board of Commissioners approved Resolution 2013-78, which authorized an alteration to the OSRD Development Plan for the Morgan Farms Subdivision to allow for required landscaping improvements within the arterial road buffer area along the right-of-way of the future McEwen Drive. The buffer area is considered part of the permanent open space for the project. That plan showed a total of 15.02 acres of excess open space for the project.

On April 8, 2013 the Board of Commissioners approved Resolution 2013-29, which authorized a modification to the permanent open space for the project, increasing the amount of excess open space by 1.59 acres, or from 13.43 acres to 15.02 acres.

On May 12, 2008 the Board of Commissioners approved Resolution 2008-24, which authorized an alteration to open space in the Azalea Park subdivision, increasing the amount of excess open space within the project by 11.71 acres from the original total to a new total of 13.43 acres.

On September 24, 2007 the Board of Commissioners voted to approve Ordinance 2007-22, which established OSRD zoning for approximately 209 acres of property which was included as part of the boundary adjustment (Ordinance 2007-19) between Brentwood and Franklin. The property was known as the Morgan Property, a/k/a Azalea Park. The ordinance became effective on October 24, 2007.

On July 9, 2007 the Board of Commissioners voted to approve Ordinance 2007-19, authorizing an agreement with the City of Franklin to adjust the contiguous boundary separating the two cities in the area south of Split Log Road.
Karen Harper 06/14/2016:CC  Ordinance 2016-05 - An Ordinance to Amend Ordinance 2015-05, the Budget Appropriations Ordinance for the 2015-2016 Fiscal Year  Finance
  Ordinance 2016-05, if approved, will amend the current FY 2015-2016 Appropriations (Budget) Ordinance to formally authorize recommended adjustments to expenditures and operating transfers for the General Fund, Drug Fund, Equipment Replacement Fund, Capital Projects Fund, and the Insurance Fund.

A budget amendment is legally required when the total actual expenditures for a fund are expected to exceed the original total appropriation for the fund. The reasons for these amendments are typically identified by staff during the course of the fiscal year and then the amendments are formally considered by the Board at the end of the fiscal year to ensure legal compliance. Often these amendments are needed to provide current year funding for capital projects and equipment that will be initiated or purchased in the new fiscal year beginning July 1. The amendment process requires staff to identify and certify that additional revenue sources in the current fiscal year are available to fund the new expenditures.

The recommended amendments are summarized below:

 General Fund (110)

Additional revenues of $2,455,000 reflect positive revenue collections in the current year over original budgeted estimates.
 
Proposed expenditure amendments are as follows:

1.  A special FY 2016 year-end appropriation transfer of $2,395,000 from the General Fund to the Capital Projects Fund funded through projected excess revenue collections in the current fiscal year to pay for certain proposed FY 2017 capital projects and equipment. (See attachment A for projects list.)  The projects include funding for upgrades and expansion of the City's radio communication system ($1,100,000 – page 41 of CIP),  funding for construction of Flagpole and Wikle Parks ($300,000 – page 95 of CIP), funding for fiber installation on Wilson Pike, ($100,000 – page 37 of CIP), funding for traffic signal upgrades ($165,000 - page 77 CIP), additional funding for Crockett roundabout ($100,000 - page 57 CIP), additional funding for Sunset/Ragsdale intersection ($300,000 - page 75 CIP), funding for Bikeway improvements ($150,000 - page 50 CIP), funding for Pavement Management System ($90,000 - page 73 CIP), and funding for Sidewalks ($90,000 - page 69 CIP).

2.   A special FY 2016 year-end transfer of $60,000 from the General Fund to the Equipment Replacement Fund for the FY 2017 purchase of a mini-excavator for the Public Works Department ($60,000 - page 19 CIP).

3.  A special FY 2016 year-end transfer of $7,800,000 from the General Fund unassigned fund balance to the Capital Projects Fund to provide additional funding for Sunset/Ragsdale Road intersection improvements ($4,800,000), construction of Flagpole and Wikle parks ($1,500,000) and construction of phase II Smith Park ($1,500,000). (See attachment A for project list.)

4. An appropriation increase of $117,991 to the Fire and Rescue activity for incidentals and overtime paid to City of Brentwood firefighters that were deployed to South Carolina to help with water rescue efforts due to the flooding caused by Hurricane Joaquin and Assistance to Fire Fighters Grant expenditures for 16 self-contained breathing apparatus, 32 air cylinders, two quick disconnect regulators, and 10 AV 3000 masks.  Funding provided by FEMA reimbursement funds ($33,103) and Assistance to Fire Fighters Grant (84,888.)

5.  An appropriation increase to the Public Works activity for $82,500, for the cost of brush disposal not budgeted in FY 2016.
            
The proposed total General Fund appropriation increase of $10,255,000 will leave a minimum projected General Fund unassigned fund balance as of June 30, 2016 of $26.3 million.  The fund balance will exceed the stated budget policy objective of maintaining a minimum of 40% in reserves for future needs and emergencies.  Please note it is likely that the final unrestricted fund balance will be higher because the exact amount will not be known until August 1, 2016 when the Halls Income Tax proceeds for FY 2016 are received from the State of Tennessee.

Drug Fund (126)

An increase in the appropriation for this fund by $17,700 is proposed for the purchase of CID Audio/Video equipment with funding provided through extra revenue received through drug enforcement activities.  This purchase was approved at the April 27, 2015 City Commission meeting but the purchase was not completed until FY 2016.  Funding for the expenditure will be provided through the restricted Federal Forfeited Property fund balance (current balance as of May 2016 is $432,423).

Equipment Replacement Fund (310)

Additional revenue of $60,000 reflects the special year-end appropriation transfer from the General Fund as referenced above.

Capital Projects Fund (311)

Additional revenue of $10,195,000 reflects the special year-end appropriation transfers from the General Fund as referenced above.

Insurance Fund (320)

Additional revenue of $189,650 reflects stop loss (reinsurance) amounts received for payments of individual medical claims above the stop loss base amount of $70,000 and prescription drug rebates from Blue Cross ($102,260).   Note that additional stop loss payments and prescription drug rebates may be received for claims incurred prior to June 30, 2016.  

An increase in the appropriation of this fund by $291,910 will cover potential medical claims and stop loss premiums that may exceed the budgeted estimate for FY 2016.  As previously discussed, the additional claims do not represent an increasing claims trend across the group as a whole but are instead reflective of several larger claims.  The increased appropriation also includes a contingency amount for any unknown medical situations that may arise prior to June 30, 2016.  Funding will be provided through the payments received from our stop loss carrier as referenced above as well as the positive cash flow of the Insurance Fund as of June 30, 2016.   The health insurance division of the Insurance Fund is projected to show a healthy fund balance of $1,285,700 at June 30, 2016.         

SUMMARY

The recommended budget appropriations amendments are primarily bookkeeping in nature to meet the legal requirements for compliance with annual budget appropriations. Whenever possible, budget amendments for the current fiscal year should be carried out before the end of the fiscal year and prior to the beginning of the independent audit for FY 2016.

Should the City Commission have any questions concerning this information, please contact the Interim Finance Director.
06/27/2016:CC  Ordinance 2016-05 - An Ordinance to Amend Ordinance 2015-05, the Budget Appropriations Ordinance for the 2015-2016 Fiscal Year  Finance
  Ordinance 2016-05, if approved, will amend the current FY 2015-2016 Appropriations (Budget) Ordinance to formally authorize recommended adjustments to expenditures and operating transfers for the General Fund, Drug Fund, Equipment Replacement Fund, Capital Projects Fund, and the Insurance Fund.

A budget amendment is legally required when the total actual expenditures for a fund are expected to exceed the original total appropriation for the fund. The reasons for these amendments are typically identified by staff during the course of the fiscal year and then the amendments are formally considered by the Board at the end of the fiscal year to ensure legal compliance. Often these amendments are needed to provide current year funding for capital projects and equipment that will be initiated or purchased in the new fiscal year beginning July 1. The amendment process requires staff to identify and certify that additional revenue sources in the current fiscal year are available to fund the new expenditures.

The recommended amendments are summarized below:

 General Fund (110)

Additional revenues of $2,455,000 reflect positive revenue collections in the current year over original budgeted estimates.
 
Proposed expenditure amendments are as follows:

1.  A special FY 2016 year-end appropriation transfer of $2,395,000 from the General Fund to the Capital Projects Fund funded through projected excess revenue collections in the current fiscal year to pay for certain proposed FY 2017 capital projects and equipment. (See attachment A for projects list.)  The projects include funding for upgrades and expansion of the City's radio communication system ($1,100,000 – page 41 of CIP),  funding for construction of Flagpole and Wikle Parks ($300,000 – page 95 of CIP), funding for fiber installation on Wilson Pike, ($100,000 – page 37 of CIP), funding for traffic signal upgrades ($165,000 - page 77 CIP), additional funding for Crockett roundabout ($100,000 - page 57 CIP), additional funding for Sunset/Ragsdale intersection ($300,000 - page 75 CIP), funding for Bikeway improvements ($150,000 - page 50 CIP), funding for Pavement Management System ($90,000 - page 73 CIP), and funding for Sidewalks ($90,000 - page 69 CIP).

2.   A special FY 2016 year-end transfer of $60,000 from the General Fund to the Equipment Replacement Fund for the FY 2017 purchase of a mini-excavator for the Public Works Department ($60,000 - page 19 CIP).

3.  A special FY 2016 year-end transfer of $7,800,000 from the General Fund unassigned fund balance to the Capital Projects Fund to provide additional funding for Sunset/Ragsdale Road intersection improvements ($4,800,000), construction of Flagpole and Wikle parks ($1,500,000) and construction of phase II Smith Park ($1,500,000). (See attachment A for project list.)

4. An appropriation increase of $117,991 to the Fire and Rescue activity for incidentals and overtime paid to City of Brentwood firefighters that were deployed to South Carolina to help with water rescue efforts due to the flooding caused by Hurricane Joaquin and Assistance to Fire Fighters Grant expenditures for 16 self-contained breathing apparatus, 32 air cylinders, two quick disconnect regulators, and 10 AV 3000 masks.  Funding provided by FEMA reimbursement funds ($33,103) and Assistance to Fire Fighters Grant (84,888.)

5.  An appropriation increase to the Public Works activity for $82,500, for the cost of brush disposal not budgeted in FY 2016.
            
The proposed total General Fund appropriation increase of $10,255,000 will leave a minimum projected General Fund unassigned fund balance as of June 30, 2016 of $26.3 million.  The fund balance will exceed the stated budget policy objective of maintaining a minimum of 40% in reserves for future needs and emergencies.  Please note it is likely that the final unrestricted fund balance will be higher because the exact amount will not be known until August 1, 2016 when the Halls Income Tax proceeds for FY 2016 are received from the State of Tennessee.

Drug Fund (126)

An increase in the appropriation for this fund by $17,700 is proposed for the purchase of CID Audio/Video equipment with funding provided through extra revenue received through drug enforcement activities.  This purchase was approved at the April 27, 2015 City Commission meeting but the purchase was not completed until FY 2016.  Funding for the expenditure will be provided through the restricted Federal Forfeited Property fund balance (current balance as of May 2016 is $432,423).

Equipment Replacement Fund (310)

Additional revenue of $60,000 reflects the special year-end appropriation transfer from the General Fund as referenced above.

Capital Projects Fund (311)

Additional revenue of $10,195,000 reflects the special year-end appropriation transfers from the General Fund as referenced above.

Insurance Fund (320)

Additional revenue of $189,650 reflects stop loss (reinsurance) amounts received for payments of individual medical claims above the stop loss base amount of $70,000 and prescription drug rebates from Blue Cross ($102,260).   Note that additional stop loss payments and prescription drug rebates may be received for claims incurred prior to June 30, 2016.  

An increase in the appropriation of this fund by $291,910 will cover potential medical claims and stop loss premiums that may exceed the budgeted estimate for FY 2016.  As previously discussed, the additional claims do not represent an increasing claims trend across the group as a whole but are instead reflective of several larger claims.  The increased appropriation also includes a contingency amount for any unknown medical situations that may arise prior to June 30, 2016.  Funding will be provided through the payments received from our stop loss carrier as referenced above as well as the positive cash flow of the Insurance Fund as of June 30, 2016.   The health insurance division of the Insurance Fund is projected to show a healthy fund balance of $1,285,700 at June 30, 2016.         

SUMMARY

The recommended budget appropriations amendments are primarily bookkeeping in nature to meet the legal requirements for compliance with annual budget appropriations. Whenever possible, budget amendments for the current fiscal year should be carried out before the end of the fiscal year and prior to the beginning of the independent audit for FY 2016.

Should the City Commission have any questions concerning this information, please contact the Interim Finance Director.
11/14/2016:CC  Resolution 2016-78 - Acquisition of Right-of-Way and Easements to Construct a roundabout at Crockett Road/Green Hill Boulevard/Raintree Parkway  Engineering
  Resolution 2016-78 - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A roundabout AT CROCKETT ROAD, GREEN HILL BOULEVARD AND RAINTREE PARKWAY INTERSECTIONS, for adoption